Chicago Sit-In and the Future of Green Jobs

December 9th, 2008 by Phil Mattera

The sit-in at Chicago’s Republic Windows & Doors brings together a host of issues such as labor rights in a plant closing, the refusal of a major bank receiving billions in federal bailout funds to invest in a struggling company, and the fragility of blue-collar employment in the weakening economy. Let me add another to the mix: the fate of green jobs.

Coverage of the labor dispute tends to treat Republic as an old-line manufacturer desperately trying to survive in a new economy. On the contrary, Republic’s business – the production of replacement windows – is a key component of the clean energy revolution being so widely touted these days. Installing those windows lowers the amount of energy used by homes and commercial buildings, thereby reducing the need for new fossil-fuel-burning power plants. The Apollo Alliance is calling for a national energy efficiency commitment to reduce energy use in new and existing buildings at least 30 percent by 2025.

Before it fell on hard times, Republic was promoting green principles not just in terms of the uses of its windows but also in the way its products were made. In December 2003 the company issued a press release announcing that it was developing a “cradle to cradle” design system that would allow the materials in its windows to be fully recycled, thus avoiding the generation of waste. The project received funding from the Chicago Department of the Environment. In a follow-up interview with Industry Week, company executive Les Teichner said Republic was also looking into ways to expand the life span of window frames so they could remain in place longer while the company would replace and recycle window sashes more frequently.

It’s not clear to what extent Republic was able to follow through on its ambitious environmental plans and what role they played in the company’s competitive and financial circumstances. It is also not yet known whether the announced closing of the company last week was more the result of a shutoff of credit by Bank of America or a decision by the company’s owners to move the operations out of state.

In any event, the situation serves as a cautionary tale for proponents of green jobs. We cannot assume that the clean-energy revolution will happen spontaneously nor that the kinds of jobs it creates will necessarily meet the highest standards. Aggressive government enforcement of labor laws and strong union advocacy of the sort being demonstrated by the UE at Republic will be necessary to fulfill the promises of the green-collar economy.

Rank-and-file activism like that being employed by the Republic workers will also be a key part of the equation. The Republic sit-in harkens back to the labor militancy of the 1930s but it also looks forward to the coming struggle to create a future of secure, well-paying and environmentally-friendly jobs.

7 Responses to “Chicago Sit-In and the Future of Green Jobs”

  1. Ian Elwood says:

    Great piece and of course, very worrisome. I instantly think of Avi Lewis and Naomi Klein’s movie “The Take” about worker takeovers of the factories in Argentina.

    http://www.thetake.org/index.cfm?page_name=synopsis

    Though I think these workers just want to get the paycheck that they rightfully deserve, I wonder if the thought has crossed their minds that they could probably keep making and selling windows without the consent of the company owners or banks–no one has been successful in kicking them out of the factory yet, what is to stop them?

  2. Phil Mattera says:

    Worker-run companies have always had a hard time surviving in this country. The Republic workers may have thought a takeover was a hopeless cause during the current credit crunch. Perhaps some progressive Democrats in Congress should push for a portion of the big planned federal stimulus package to consist of loan funds for worker cooperatives.

  3. [...] Mattera explains that the labor dispute at Chicago’s Republic Windows & Doors is an example of how enforcement of labor laws, union advocacy, worker activism are key to winning [...]

  4. Interesting take. You’re right, everything I’ve read portrays Republic as a dying, old manufacturer of outdated products. I suppose businesses like Republic, making replacement windows and such, would benefit alot from Obama’s proposed green stimulus plans. If the government is going to undertake a big effort to make public buildings more energy efficient, replacement windows and doors should be big business. (BTW, I link to your post in my blog.)

  5. huck says:

    Republic got $9.6 million in TIF money from the city to build their factory in part because of there green energy practices. Before the settlement local alderman vowed to investigate Republic and try to recover some of the TIF money they received just seven years ago. They build the building sold it to an investment firm who sold it to Wrigley and then rented the space back at an inflated rate. So they cashed out and now they are taking the money and running out of state. This is a historic victory, let just hope that now that the politicians will follow through on their promise to investigate Republic and recover all the money they stole from tax payers and worker to create job.

  6. william says:

    yes, and let us give our support to create more green jobs for the people!

    http://5milliongreenjobs.org

  7. [...] Phil Mattera of Good Jobs First pointed out that in the web of issues raised by the confrontation — including unemployment and the loss of manufacturing jobs; fairness for workers in plant closings; and accountability for the federal bank bailout — the issue of green jobs was overlooked in media accounts. (Indeed the connection with the bailout was largely elided in earlier accounts — presented in photos of picketers’ signs but left out of accompanying articles — before politicians began raising it.) [...]

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.