Bailing out individual companies such as AIG is one thing. Today’s newspapers are filled with astounding reports that the federal government is devising a plan to bail out the entire financial sector—by taking over all the toxic assets that pollute the balance sheets of banks and other institutions. There is talk that this scheme is patterned on the savings and loan rescue of a generation ago. But unlike that rescue, the idea now is that the feds would, as the New York Times puts it, “take over only distressed assets, not entire institutions.”
“Bailout” hardly begins to capture the magnitude of what is being considered—apparently with bipartisan consent from Congress. This is absolution: the full faith and credit of the United State are being marshaled to absolve financial institutions of their sins. The consequences of years of greed, imprudence and short-sightedness would be wiped clean. With their financial souls thus renewed, we are supposed to believe banks will go forth to lend and invest with care and integrity.
One’s first instinct is to denounce this outrageous use of taxpayer money to rescue wealthy institutions that brought this problem on themselves, and will inevitability do it again. But perhaps that’s not the best response. The severity of the crisis has created openings for unprecedented government intervention. But why should banks get all the benefits? If Uncle Sam’s wallet is wide open, why shouldn’t the rest of us share in the largesse?
If banks are going to have their balance sheets cleansed, why can’t the same be done for the household accounts of America’s working families? Here’s the outline of a program for bailing out the rest of us:
- Wipe out unpaid medical debts of the uninsured and the underinsured;
- Wipe out credit card debt for all households with less than the median income;
- Wipe out subprime mortgages and give immediate title to the homeowners;
- Wipe out payday loans and all other predatory lending obligations;
- Wipe out unpaid student loan debt for those earning less than the median income; and
- Wipe out auto loans and other installment loans for those earning less than the median income.
Sounds unrealistic, ridiculously expensive? Probably so, but it would be no less outlandish than the proposals being made to benefit financial institutions that have brought the country to the brink of economic collapse. If now is a time for bold moves, let’s see some audacity on behalf of the many, not only the few.
It is astonishing that after deregulating and privatizing which is supposed
to make these financial institutions and capitalism work (better?) the taxpayers are called on to save them. Would we have had a crash like
1929? The only consolation is that some investment bankers have lost
their private planes and multi-million dollar estates in the Hamptons.
How is it also that we are expected to honor and pay for the golden parachutes for the CEO’s of these institutions when thousands of workers
have lost their pensions and retiree heath care. Those were contractual
agreements also.
Mike Harrington used to say that capitalism was only 250 years old and a system based on exploitation and greed was doomed to fail. He went on to say that we would likely not see its replacement in our lifetime.
Maybe. A trillion dollar buyout of Wall St. by the American people should be invested in a new United States Investment Bank, with a mission to control patient capital so as to reinvest over time in all those social and economic gains for working people described by Phil.
One has to wonder why Congress and the President doesn’t follow the previous precedent of 1933:
— Recreate Homeowners Loan Corporation
— Buy the defaulted mortgages and mortgages in jeopardy
— Refinance them at less than 5% for 15 years and ultimately make some money on the deals
At least the assets would remain with the homeowner, equity holder, and not wind up in a new quasi-commodity traders market dealing in foreclosed, abandoned homes while the taxpayer/ one-home-owner goes to the street or bankruptcy court.